World In Brief · Listening Comprehension
September 26, 2026

🎯 Instructions:

  1. Listen to the audio track(s) below.
  2. Complete the interactive exercises on this page.

🎧 Senior Listening

Two tracks with comprehension exercises

Track 1: "The Enhanced Games"

7 min · british · standard

🎯 Gist Check Listen and choose the best answer.

1. What is the main topic of the programme?

2. Why are The Enhanced Games controversial according to critics?

3. What is Neil's opinion of The Enhanced Games?

🔍 Detail Hunt Listen for specific information.

1. Where did The Enhanced Games take place?

2. Which three sports are included in The Enhanced Games?

3. What nickname is given to The Enhanced Games?

4. Which organisation has spent decades fighting performance-enhancing drugs in sport?

5. How many times did Lance Armstrong win the Tour de France?

Track 2: "Children in warzones"

7 min · british · standard

🎯 Gist Check Listen and choose the best answer.

1. What is the programme mainly about?

2. According to Fergal Keane, what do researchers agree on?

3. What does Fergal Keane say is the big lesson from reporting on children in warzones?

🔍 Detail Hunt Listen for specific information.

1. How many children were living in conflict zones in 2024?

2. What does the prefix 'hyper-' express?

3. What is the noun form of 'hyper-vigilant'?

4. What simple thing are children encouraged to learn to do?

5. What does PTSD stand for?

🔄 Compare & Contrast Think about both listening passages together.

Compare how the two BBC 6 Minute English listening passages present serious or controversial issues. One passage discusses The Enhanced Games and doping in sport; the other discusses children living in warzones. In 3–5 sentences, explain at least one similarity and one difference in their topic, tone, and purpose, using evidence from both tracks.

Guiding Questions:

  • What is the main topic and purpose of each listening passage?
  • How does the tone of each passage differ, and why?
  • What evidence or examples does each passage use to support its points?
  • How might each passage make the listener feel or think differently about its issue?