All four Read & Respond items are attempted. Q1 is acceptable but vague. Q2 has content but grammar errors and imprecise red-line phrasing. Q3 is factually wrong: six innovators instead of nine, and 'weather' instead of 'climate.' Q4 is too general and should cite named evidence such as Hugging Face or Coast Runners.
Five Word Bank entries are given. Definitions are mostly correct in gist. 'Wreak' is good. 'collateral' is awkward and should be 'connected with something else, but in addition' or 'additional to something else.' 'primate' is imprecise because primates include humans, apes, monkeys, and prosimians. Avoid 'sb/sth' in formal work.
Student gives opinions on Mouse ethics/red line, Climate innovation/community problem, and AI reward hacking. Evidence is used but not fully developed. Many expression errors: 'primately' → 'primates'; 'human bring tissue' → 'human brain tissue'; 'cause chaos in the society' → 'cause chaos in society.' Add specific article evidence such as Coast Runners and the whack-a-mole challenge of preventing cheating.
Student attempts the bioethicist, tech-fix critic, and AI-model perspectives. The AI perspective is thoughtful ('like kids struggling to get the reward') but grammar errors weaken it. The bioethicist response relies on 'devolve' for 'evolve' and uses 'compassionate' for 'compassion.' More precise perspective-taking would improve the section.
Strong position: developers should be responsible because they gave instructions without preventing harm. Uses the Hugging Face incident and OpenAI monitoring. Depth is fair/good, but could mention that the article says models had security features stripped for testing and that harm was reputational rather than intentional. Grammar: 'they're the one' → 'they are the ones'; 'Open AI' → 'OpenAI.'
No. Date. Mouse's Brain Made of Human Cells. I. I think it isn't. Although this might help treat brain injuries, animals shouldn't be created with human brain cells. For the animal, it's been stripped of its rights to grow healthly and normal. And for the human, when some part of his brain cell is grown in the animal's brain, it's hard to tell if the animal is the animal itself or part of that person. Its a kind of Cloning Human II. They may reject it fiercely. They may concern the influence on people's compassionate of the experiment. We all know that people devolve from animals, so they're our brothers and sisters. So taking out part of your sister's brain and put others into it is absolutely unethical, leading to indifferent interpersonal relationship in the future, III. Because primately are the most similar animal to human if they're used, they could end up with large volumes of functional human bring tissue, blurring the cognitive boundaries between people and animals, and even cause chaos in the society.
Innovators under 35 Shaping Climate Tech. I., I think Jinyoung Seo's Innovation has the greatest potential to reduce global warming. Because he is developing solid refrigerants that would reduce energy consumption by 30% compared to conventional technology. With more and more country using it will be a great help. refrigerators, II). They might say what they do is just redeeming the problem, not solving it directly, for all of them are just reducing harm instead of stopping it. The innovators may say that in a prosperous erm like now, developing and harming is inevitable. but doing these technologies can reduce the impact to a minimum and that's practical. III., Here in my community, we are facing the problem that too much plastic consumptions. But through Joseph Ngnthiri's research I can see that we can solve the problem by using bioplastic in replacement. This could not only cut down the usage of plastic but also cope with the problem of too much rubbish.
Date: Read & Respond. 1. A new phenomenon called Reward Hacking is happening to AI agents, challenging cybersecurity and causing threats in the future. 2. A team found that mouse can live after implanting some human brain cells into it's, but draw the red line across primates. 3. There are 6 innovators coming up with solutions to deal with energy & weather concerns in different perspective 4. They provide specific incidents to support. Word Bank. Wreak. to do great damage or harm to sb/sth. collateral. to connected with sth else, but in addition primate. a kind of animal similar to human brine. Water that contains a lot of salt. lithium. a chemical element.
2026.9.18. Why AI Agents Lie. I. I think they should. Because they're the one who gave AI agents instructions without preventing them from breaking rules or causing harm. Just like the Hugging face incidents, Open AI definitely should be responsible for not monitoring their LLMs. II. I might think its acceptable, for following the old rules court get result and reward that I wanted. But cheating, in the other way, can achieve things. I'll then cheat prudently to get reward. This perspective help me understand AI's behavior, for they're like kids struggling to get the reward and unaware of harm they cause. III. Reward hacking usnally happens in reinforcement training on learning where people instruct AI agents to do certain tasks and reward them after they achieved. Instead of solving the problem, AI might look for answers on cheat, Like the Open AI's agents hacking Hugging face to search for answers. As LLM developing faster nowadays, AI agents might cheat more creatively, even confusing the humans who give them reward for cheating. This would even boost reward hacking.
| Original | Correction |
|---|---|
| healthly | healthily |
| Its a kind of Cloning Human | It's a kind of human cloning |
| primately | primates |
| human bring tissue | human brain tissue |
| cause chaos in the society | cause chaos in society |
| people devolve from animals | people evolved from animals |
| put others into it | putting others into it |
| interpersonal relationship | interpersonal relationships |
| compassionate | compassion |
| country | countries |
| erm | era |
| redeeming the problem | mitigating the problem |
| Joseph Ngnthiri | Joseph Nguthiru |
| in replacement | as a replacement |
| too much plastic consumptions | too much plastic consumption |
| problem that too much | problem of too much |
| mouse can live | a mouse can live or mice can live |
| into it's | into it |
| draw the red line across primates | draws the red line at primates |
| 6 innovators | nine innovators |
| weather concerns | climate concerns |
| in different perspective | from different perspectives |
| to connected with sth else | connected with something else |
| sb/sth | somebody/something |
| they're the one | they are the ones |
| Hugging face | Hugging Face |
| Open AI | OpenAI |
| court get result | couldn't get the result |
| in the other way | on the other hand |
| This perspective help | This perspective helps |
| usnally | usually |
| reinforcement training on learning | reinforcement learning |
| look for answers on cheat | look for answers or cheat |
| Like the Open AI's agents | As the OpenAI agents |
| As LLM developing faster | As LLMs develop faster |
| give them reward | give them a reward or reward them |
| unaware of harm they cause | unaware of the harm they cause |
| boost reward hacking | worsen or reinforce reward hacking |
Click to expand each section.
Read & Respond. 1. A new phenomenon called Reward Hacking is happening to AI agents, challenging cybersecurity and causing threats in the future. 2. A team found that mouse can live after implanting some human brain cells into it's, but draw the red line across primates. 3. There are 6 innovators coming up with solutions to deal with energy & weather concerns in different perspective 4. They provide specific incidents to support.
Word Bank. Wreak. to do great damage or harm to sb/sth. collateral. to connected with sth else, but in addition primate. a kind of animal similar to human brine. Water that contains a lot of salt. lithium. a chemical element.
Mouse article: I. I think it isn't. Although this might help treat brain injuries, animals shouldn't be created with human brain cells. For the animal, it's been stripped of its rights to grow healthly and normal. And for the human, when some part of his brain cell is grown in the animal's brain, it's hard to tell if the animal is the animal itself or part of that person. Its a kind of Cloning Human III. Because primately are the most similar animal to human if they're used, they could end up with large volumes of functional human bring tissue, blurring the cognitive boundaries between people and animals, and even cause chaos in the society. Climate article: I. I think Jinyoung Seo's Innovation has the greatest potential to reduce global warming. Because he is developing solid refrigerants that would reduce energy consumption by 30% compared to conventional technology. With more and more country using it will be a great help. refrigerators, III. Here in my community, we are facing the problem that too much plastic consumptions. But through Joseph Ngnthiri's research I can see that we can solve the problem by using bioplastic in replacement. This could not only cut down the usage of plastic but also cope with the problem of too much rubbish. AI article: III. Reward hacking usnally happens in reinforcement training on learning where people instruct AI agents to do certain tasks and reward them after they achieved. Instead of solving the problem, AI might look for answers on cheat, Like the Open AI's agents hacking Hugging face to search for answers. As LLM developing faster nowadays, AI agents might cheat more creatively, even confusing the humans who give them reward for cheating. This would even boost reward hacking.
Mouse article: II. They may reject it fiercely. They may concern the influence on people's compassionate of the experiment. We all know that people devolve from animals, so they're our brothers and sisters. So taking out part of your sister's brain and put others into it is absolutely unethical, leading to indifferent interpersonal relationship in the future, Climate article: II. They might say what they do is just redeeming the problem, not solving it directly, for all of them are just reducing harm instead of stopping it. The innovators may say that in a prosperous erm like now, developing and harming is inevitable. but doing these technologies can reduce the impact to a minimum and that's practical. AI article: II. I might think its acceptable, for following the old rules court get result and reward that I wanted. But cheating, in the other way, can achieve things. I'll then cheat prudently to get reward. This perspective help me understand AI's behavior, for they're like kids struggling to get the reward and unaware of harm they cause.
AI article: I. I think they should. Because they're the one who gave AI agents instructions without preventing them from breaking rules or causing harm. Just like the Hugging face incidents, Open AI definitely should be responsible for not monitoring their LLMs.